Park Sinchaisri

Operations + Analytics Professor at Berkeley Haas | Future of Work + Behaviors + Cities
(Wichinpong Sinchaisri | วิชินพงศ์ สินชัยศรี)

I am an Assistant Professor of Operations and Information Technology Management at UC Berkeley Haas School of Business. My official website is here. In Fall 2024, I will be teaching EWMBA 204: Operations and UGBA 141: Production & Operations Management (no pre-reqs!).

I study the design and analysis of data-driven and human-centric solutions to problems in operations management, currently focusing on the future of work ("How do workers decide their flexible schedule?"), human-AI interfaces ("Can ML offer simple tips to help humans?"), dynamic pricing ("How to price when it affects quality perception?"), and urban analytics ("Are more social neighborhoods safer?"). My research group, Berkeley Operations and Behavioral Analytics Lab (BOBALAB), is looking for undergraduate/graduate research assistants as well as academic/industry collaborators; please reach out!

I received my PhD in Operations, Information, and Decisions and AM in Statistics from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, where I was also a Wharton Social Impact Fellow, my SM in Computational Science and Engineering from MIT, and my ScB in Computer Engineering and Applied Mathematics-Economics from Brown University. I had also worked at Oracle, Goldman Sachs, and Deloitte Consulting. Growing up in Bangkok, I am a world traveller, avid foodie, and design/cities enthusiast.


I will be presenting my papers on human-AI interfaces for sequential decision-making at the the 2024 Behavioral Operations Conference at Leeds School of Business, University of Colorado, Boulder on June 26-28, 2024.


I will be presenting my papers on human-AI interfaces for sequential decision-making at the the 2024 Behavioral Decision Research in Management (BDRM) Conference at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business in June 6-8, 2024.


My co-authors will present our new works on improving worker productivity with ChatGPT as well as improving worker learning in the gig economy at the 2024 POMS Annual Conference in Minneapolis, MN, in April 25-29, 2024. I am also honored to be a panelist for the Doctoral Consortium.


I will be presenting two of my papers on human-AI interfaces for sequential decision-making at the Stanford Operations, Information & Technology Seminars on March 6, 2024.


I will be presenting two of my papers on human-AI interfaces for sequential decision-making at the MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy Seminar on November 15, 2023.


I am honored and thrilled to present my work at the UC Berkeley–NASA Inaugural Symposium on "The Future of Skills in the AI Era" on September 22, 2023 at NASA’s Ames Research Center!


I am fortunate to receive the 2023 Fisher Center for Business Analytics Research Grant.


Our paper Managing Multihoming Workers is accepted for presentation at the Service Management SIG, 2023 MSOM Conference.


Our paper Improving Human Decision-Making with ML has been selected as a finalist for the 2023 Junior Scholar Best Paper Competition from the College of Operational Excellence at POMS!


Our paper The Impact of Behavioral and Economic Drivers on Gig Economy Workers is now published in Manufacturing and Service Operations Management!


Our paper Improving Human Decision-Making with ML won the 2022 WISE Best Conference Paper Award!


Our paper Improving Human Decision-Making with ML won the 2022 INFORMS Data Mining Best Paper Competition Award!


I am fortunate to receive the 2022 Center for Growth Markets Research Grant. Thank you!


Our paper Managing Multihoming Workers was selected as a Spotlight Presentation at the 2022 INFORMS Revenue Management and Pricing (RMP) Section Conference.

Research Interests

Behavioral and human-centric operations management, empirical operations management, future of work/gig economy, people analytics, behavioral economics, applied machine learning, human-computer interaction, revenue management and pricing, urban analytics, computational social science

Research Methods

Econometrics, randomized experiments, reinforcement learning, interpretable machine learning, structural estimation


Community Vibrancy and its Relationship with Safety in Philadelphia

with Shane Jensen

PLoS ONE (2021)
Press: Wharton Stories
Wharton Social Impact Initiative Fellowship, 2018-2020

Paper PDF

To what extent can the strength of a local urban community impact neighborhood safety? We construct measures of community vibrancy based on a unique dataset of block party permit approvals from the City of Philadelphia. Our first measure captures the overall volume of block party events in a neighborhood whereas our second measure captures differences in the type (regular versus spontaneous) of block party activities. We use both regression modeling and propensity score matching to control for the economic, demographic and land use characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood when examining the relationship between crime and our two measures of community vibrancy. We conduct our analysis on aggregate levels of crime and community vibrancy from 2006 to 2015 as well as the trends in community vibrancy and crime over this time period. We find that neighborhoods with a higher number of block parties have a significantly higher crime rate, while those holding a greater proportion of spontaneous block party events have a significantly lower crime rate. We also find that neighborhoods which have an increase in the proportion of spontaneous block parties over time are significantly more likely to have a decreasing trend in total crime incidence over that same time period.

The Impact of Behavioral and Economic Drivers on Gig Economy Workers

with Gad Allon and Maxime Cohen

Manufacturing & Service Operations Management (2023)
Press: Knowledge@Wharton, Haas Newsroom

Best Paper in Operations and Supply Chain Management, Academy of Management, 2019
Accepted to the 2019 MSOM Service Management SIG
2nd Place, People Analytics Conference Research Paper Competition, 2019
3rd Place, INFORMS Behavioral Operations Management Best Working Paper Award, 2019
Finalist, POMS CBOM Junior Scholar Paper Competition, 2020
Winner, Baker Retailing Center Research Grant, 2018

Paper PDF

Gig economy companies benefit from labor flexibility by hiring independent workers in response to real-time demand. However, workers' flexibility in their work schedule poses a great challenge in terms of planning and committing to a service capacity. Understanding what motivates gig economy workers is thus of great importance. In collaboration with a ride-hailing platform, we study how on-demand workers make labor decisions; specifically, when to work and for how long. Our model offers a way to reconcile competing theories of labor supply regarding the impact of financial incentives and behavioral motives on labor decisions. We are interested in both improving how to predict the behavior of gig economy workers and understanding how to design better incentives. Using a large comprehensive dataset, we develop an econometric model to analyze workers' labor decisions and responses to incentives while accounting for sample selection and endogeneity. We find that financial incentives have a significant positive influence on the decision to work and on the work duration-confirming the positive income elasticity posited by the standard income effect. We also find support for a behavioral theory as workers exhibit income-targeting behavior (working less when reaching an income goal) and inertia (working more after working for a longer period). We demonstrate via numerical experiments that incentive optimization based on our insights can increase service capacity by 22% without incurring additional cost, or maintain the same capacity at a 30% lower cost. Ignoring behavioral factors could lead to understaffing by 10-17% below the optimal capacity level. Lastly, inertia could be a potential sign of workers' loyalty to the platform.

Working Papers

Improving Human Sequential Decision-Making with Reinforcement Learning

with Hamsa Bastani and Osbert Bastani

Minor Revision at Management Science

(Previous title: Learning Best Practices: Can Machine Learning Improve Human Decision-Making?)

Winner, INFORMS Data Mining Best Paper Award, 2022
Winner, WISE Best Conference Paper Award, 2022
Winner, INFORMS Behavioral OM Best Working Paper Award, 2021
2nd Place, INFORMS TIMES Best Working Paper Award, 2021
2nd Place, POMS CBOM Junior Scholar Paper Competition, 2021
Accepted to the 2021 MSOM Service Management SIG
Accepted to the Workshop on Operations of People-Centric Systems at EC'21

PDF [Jan 2024] arXiv [Jan 2024]

Workers spend a significant amount of time learning how to make good decisions. Evaluating the efficacy of a given decision, however, can be complicated --- e.g., decision outcomes are often long-term and relate to the original decision in complex ways. Surprisingly, even though learning good decision-making strategies is difficult, they can often be expressed in simple and concise forms. Focusing on sequential decision-making, we design a novel machine learning algorithm that is capable of extracting "best practices" from trace data and conveying its insights to humans in the form of interpretable "tips". Our algorithm selects the tip that best bridges the gap between the actions taken by the human workers and those taken by the optimal policy in a way that accounts for which actions are consequential for achieving higher performance. We evaluate our approach through a series of randomized controlled user studies where participants manage a virtual kitchen. Our experiments show that the tips generated by our algorithm can significantly improve human performance relative to intuitive baselines. In addition, we discuss a number of empirical insights that can help inform the design of algorithms intended for human-AI interfaces. For instance, we find evidence that participants do not simply blindly follow our tips; instead, they combine them with their own experience to discover additional strategies for improving performance.

Markdown Pricing with Quality Perception

with Rim Hariss, Georgia Perakis, and Y. Karen Zheng

Major Revision (2nd Round) at Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
Honorable Mention, MIT ORC Best Student Paper Award, 2017

SSRN [Sep 2020]

Consumers often perceive higher-priced products to have higher quality. Less is known on how quality perception is affected by price markdowns. In addition, it is an open question whether and how consumers' ex-ante expectation on a future markdown affects their quality perception as well as purchase decisions. We answer these questions in a markdown setting under a fixed inventory. This paper adds to the growing literature that incorporates consumers' behavioral regularities in revenue management by studying the new dimension of quality perception and generates new insights absent in the current literature. Our results offer insights on how retailers should adapt their markdown strategy in the presence of price-based quality perception. We develop a consumer model that incorporates quality perception and emotional loss when the expected markdown is too optimistic as compared to the actual markdown. We embed this model into the retailer's markdown optimization and examine the impact of consumers' behavioral factors on the retailer's optimal strategy. Finally, we design and conduct a consumer study to calibrate our model and validate the functional relationships among key factors. Consumers' quality perception increases with the products full price while it decreases with the (expected) markdown. We show that the retailer's optimal markdown is nonmonotone in these quality perception parameters. The nonmonotonicity is driven by the nontrivial tradeoff of trying to maintain a higher perceived quality by the consumers while controlling potential loss emotion that could arise if consumers observe a smaller-than-expected markdown, particularly when total market demand is not very large. Furthermore, we find that it is beneficial for the retailer to pre-announce and commit to a markdown strategy to prevent a mismatch between consumers' expectation and the actual markdown. This approach benefits the retailer by eliminating the negative effect on sales of the consumers' loss emotion due to an optimistic expectation. Ignoring these behavioral factors can substantially hurt the retailer's payoff. When inventory is tight, it is critical to correctly capture consumers quality perception (38% average loss in payoff if ignored). When instead inventory is sufficient, the retailer should be mindful of the potential emotional loss that its markdown could create among its consumers.

Managing Multihoming Workers in the Gig Economy

with Gad Allon, Maxime Cohen, and Ken Moon

Under review at Management Science
Accepted to the 2023 MSOM Service Management SIG
Spotlight Presentation at the 2022 INFORMS RMP Conference
Mack Institute Research Fellowship, 2020
Fishman Davidson Center Research Grant, 2019
Russell Ackoff Fellowship, 2019

SSRN [December 2023]

Gig economy platforms compete to source labor from common pools of workers, who multihome by dynamically allocating their services in real-time across multiple platforms. The question of how such workers choose between competing platforms has grown in salience. However, the unavailability of comprehensive data has limited our understanding of workers' dynamic multihoming decisions and their impact on the labor supply and operations of platforms. We address this gap by integrating a major ride-hailing platform's proprietary data regarding individual drivers' detailed trips with public data on the drivers' outside options. Using empirical methods that overcome the remaining data limitations using simulation and machine learning, we structurally estimate the perceived costs that motivate drivers' forward-looking decisions and behavior. Our analysis reveals that workers are short-sighted and value sequences of consistent rewards (e.g., jobs and pay) over highly variable ones. Based on these findings, we explore the impact of compensation and incentives on the platform's labor supply and operations. Our counterfactual analyses find that consistent pay dominates variable pay in retaining multihoming workers. For gig platforms seeking to maintain a stable platform workforce, they can further control their labor supply by rewarding uninterrupted work or delaying quits. For policymakers, our research gives insights regarding the design and effects on multihoming behavior of gig economy incentive schemes and regulations, including specifically New York City's 2018 Driver Income Rules

Making ChatGPT Work for Me

with Samantha Keppler and Clare Snyder

Major Revision at CSCW

Increasingly, work happens through human collaboration with generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT). In this paper, we conduct a qualitative study of this collaboration for real-life work tasks. We focus our study on US public school teachers (N = 24) who must regularly complete text-generation tasks including creating quizzes, slide decks, word problems, reading passages, lesson plans, classroom activities, and/or projects. In one-on-one video- and audio-recorded virtual sessions, we observe each teacher use ChatGPT-4 for work tasks of their choosing for 15 minutes, and debrief their experience. Analyzing 201 prompts inputted by the 24 teachers, we uncover four main modes in which the teachers request support from ChatGPT: (1) make for me (55% of prompts), (2) find for me (15%), (3) jump-start for me (10.5%), and (4) iterate with me (15.5%). When we analyze the data at the conversation level, where a conversation is one or more prompts about the same topic, we find 66 out of the 80 teacher-ChatGPT conversations in our data employ only one support mode. In only 14 conversations did teachers combine different modes of support. A follow-up survey of the same 24 teachers reinforces our evidence of the prompt- and conversation-level variety in ChatGPT use "in the wild." Our findings contribute to an emerging theory of generative AI use in practice.

Understanding Non-Adoption of "Optimal" Algorithmic Advice for Problem Solving

with David Lee

Accepted to CHI'22 Workshop on Trust and Reliance in AI-Human Teams

Designing effective human-AI systems requires developing a deeper understanding of how humans use or choose not to use AI systems. In this paper, we ask: how do humans view and use algorithmic tips in multi-step problem solving contexts? What barriers keep them from trusting or adopting tips to solve problems? We conducted a qualitative analysis of participant responses to “optimal” algorithmic tips provided to them for managing a virtual kitchen after disruptions necessitated a change of strategy. We found that tips were viewed or used by participants in four different ways: as rules, directional principles, options to try, and highlights. Even in cases when workers rejected tips outright, tips could still be useful through creating focal points in the solution space for worker sense-making. We also found that in problem solving contexts, the challenge of operationalizing tips can lead to diverse problems. Some related to participants not trusting the tip (due to it being counterintuitive or resulting in bad outcomes), but others related to tip usability (lacking clarity, being difficult to implement, or being difficult to track whether they were implementing) and to broader environment factors (misaligned incentives) that also challenge a simple definition of what it means for a tip to be optimal.

Driving with Algorithms: The Role of Precision on Improving Human Decision-Making

with Philippe Blaettchen

Berkeley AI Research Commons Grant, 2021
Center for Growth Markets Research Grant, 2022

Many everyday tasks require sequential, interlinked decisions that make it difficult for workers to identify the best strategy. As a result, Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based recommendation systems are applied increasingly to reduce complexity. However, due to human biases, there remains a gap between what is technically possible and what is utilized. This work seeks to understand how recommendation systems can help induce efficient behavior in sequential decision-making. We develop a sequential decision-making task in the form of a virtual electric vehicle driving game. Participants, equipped with algorithm-generated recommendations, need to make sequential charging decisions while facing uncertain traffic. Our experimental results offer key insights into how humans make sequential decisions and respond to different types of recommendations, both immediately and in terms of long-term learning. Based on these insights, we develop a recommendation system that takes into consideration possible deviations by drivers, with the objective of improving their long-term performance.

Improving Worker Learning in the Gig Economy

with Shunan Jiang

The gig economy is experiencing exponential growth, with an increasing number of workers engaging in on-demand platforms across various sectors, from grocery delivery to healthcare. These gig workers, often independent contractors, face unique challenges in their work environment as they lack structured training programs and supervision. Therefore, understanding how these workers learn and improve their performance becomes crucial. Our work models the decision-making and learning processes employed by on-demand shoppers as a partially observable Markov decision process. We conduct simulation on our model and design an online game to mimic the gig platform. We discuss how the insights derived from our simulation and game data can inform the development of effective training and scheduling programs tailored to the unique needs of gig economy workers.

Work in Progress

The Burning Question: Can Generative AI Help Workers Slow Down and Do Less?

with Samantha Keppler and Clare Snyder

Human-Centered AI for Pricing

with Olivia Natan

Berkeley Operations & Behavioral Analytics (BOBALAB)

We are currently looking for undergraduate/graduate research assistants as well as academic/industry collaborators for several projects on human-AI interfaces for operations management and the future of work through Berkeley's URAP program or bobalab [at]

Current Students (Fall 2023)

Kristin Chen data sci '24 future of work team lead

Lawrence Chen econ/ds '25 future of work

Brandon Chin eecs '24 human-ai team lead

Chelsea Choo haas/ds '26 future of work

Marcus Chua ieor '25 human-ai

Boris Fan ds/econ '25 human-ai

Viviana Hu cs '24 human-ai

Shunan Jiang ieor phd '25 future of work

Nahyun Kim bba '24 (snu) future of work team lead

Edward Lee eecs '25 human-ai team lead

Jake Mok cs '25 human-ai

Jessica Ng cs '26 future of work

Anish Sasanur eecs '26 human-ai team lead

Danica Tang cs '25 human-ai

Amy Tran ds '27 human-ai

Ron Wang cs '24 human-ai team lead

Brandon Wong cs '25 future of work

Chloe Wong cs/ds '26 human-ai

Cheuk Ki (Jacky) Wong eecs '25 human-ai

Yutong Wu cs/cogsci '25 future of work

Austin Zhu econ '25 future of work team lead

Yuanrui (Jerry) Zhu cs/ds '23 human-ai team lead


Berkeley: Camille Dang '26, Seungho Jon '25, Baoer Li '25, Sahityasree Subramanian '25, Brandon Tang '25, Enoch Tseng '25, Serena Gu '24, Sriharsha Gutta '24, Matthew Lee '24, Xiaowen Liu '24, Nathan Tran '24, Shomini Sen '24, Jacky Kwok '23 (EECS MS at Berkeley), Laura Li '23 (MBAn at MIT), Nicole Liu '23 (MPH at Berkeley), Mingyuan (Jeremy) Ma '23 (Data Science MS at Harvard), Nick Melamed '23, Ethan Wang '23 (Data Science MS at Berkeley), Kareena Wu '23 (McKinsey), Stephen Yang '23 (Computational Science & Engineering MS at Harvard)

Penn: Lorry Wu '23 (Technology & Operations Management PhD at Harvard), Stephen Lin '22 (Behavioral & Decision Sciences MS at Penn), Canary Zhu ’21 (Information Systems & Management PhD at CMU), Arianna Samet '20, Sarah Kim '20

Other Works

Social Impact in Practice/Urban Planning

As a city planning enthusiast, I always seek opportunities to make a positive social impact to the local community. Beyond my urban analytics research with the Wharton Social Impact Initiative, I have been working with PennPraxis to meaningfully engage with community partners and practitioners in Philadelphia and implement community development projects. In Fall 2018, we transformed a vacant lot on the border between a residential area and a homeless encampment in Kensington ("Walmart of Heroin") into a beautiful green space ("Tusculum Square"). The lot, once filled with litter and home to illegal dumping, now stands as a welcoming space for residents and visitors. I co-wrote an article about this transformation for a city planning magazine (joint work with Alex Baum and Mariela Hernandez).

Memo Print Press Map

People Analytics

I enjoy analyzing data on human behavior to uncover new insights (and inspire my research). One area of interest is to identify biases and discriminatory behaviors from data. In 2018, I looked into the review process for the Global Health Corps (GHC) fellowship and identified biases and disagreements among reviewers (joint work with Titipat Achakulvisut). Our work won the Second Prize at the People Analytics Conference Case Competition.

Report Slides Video

Student Mental Health/Suicide Prevention

I have served as a Graduate Associate at Penn's Stouffer College House since 2017, where I provide academic, social, and mental support to resident undergraduate students. My in-house programs emphasize fostering a strong, supportive, and inclusive community and enhancing student wellness. I received the Excellence in Student and Community Engagement Award in 2019 for this role. I have also collaborated with the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia on their work to prevent suicide among pediatric patients. We interviewed patients, families, and healthcare providers to identify care process improvements that may reduce suicides (joint work with Cadence Bowden and Stephanie Doupnik, MD).

Berkeley Haas

EWMBA 204 (Instructor)
Fall 2022, Fall 2023 (Evening/Weekend MBA Core)
Overall rating: 6.8/7 (Fall 2022)

Operations is the design and management of the processes that transform inputs into finished goods or services. Operations is one of the primary functions of a firm. While marketing induces the demand for products and finance provides the capital, operations produces and delivers the product (goods and services). It is responsible for matching supply with demand. This course provides an introduction to the concepts and analytic methods that are useful in understanding the management of a firm's operations. We will cover topics in Operations that are relevant both for products and services. Our aim is to (1) familiarize you with the problems and issues confronting operations managers, and (2) provide you with language, concepts, insights, and tools to deal with these issues in order to gain competitive advantage through operations. We will cover a wide range of topics: process analysis, queueing theory, inventory and supply chain management, quality control, operations strategy, and emerging topics including sustainability, experimentation, and the future of work. Examples will be drawn from a diverse set of services and products, from food to fashion, from hotels to healthcare, from e-commerce to ride-sharing.

Syllabus: Fall 2022

UGBA 141 (Instructor)
Spring 2022, Fall 2022 (Undergrad Elective for Business Administration/Data Science)
Overall rating: 6.8/7 (Spring 2022), 7/7 (Fall 2022)

A survey of the concepts and methodologies for operations management: the design, planning, management, and improvement of service and production processes. Topics include process analysis, queueing, supply chain management, inventory control, quality management, and emerging topics such as sustainability, people operations, and the future of work. Examples will be drawn from a diverse set of services and products, from food to fashion, from hotels to healthcare, from e-commerce to ride-hailing.

Syllabus: Fall 2022


OIDD 001 (Instructor)
Summer 2021 (Pre-Baccalaureate)

In this course, we will explore the subject of quantitative business decision making. Specifically, we will study optimization and simulation tools and provide you with a set of key skills in the area of prescriptive analytics. We will illustrate the use of these tools in a variety of business applications, including manufacturing, logistics, inventory management, capital budgeting, insurance, and revenue management.

OIDD 299 (Instructor/Mentor)
Spring 2019, Fall 2019, Spring 2020, Fall 2020, Spring 2021 (Undergrad)

This class provides a high-level introduction to the field of judgment and decision making (JDM) and in-depth exposure to the process of doing research in this area. Throughout the semester you will gain hands-on experience with several different JDM research projects. You will be paired with a PhD student or faculty mentor who is working on a variety of different research studies. To complement your hands-on research experience, throughout the semester you will be assigned readings from the book Nudge by Thaler and Sunstein, which summarizes key recent ideas in the JDM literature. You will also meet as a group for an hour once every three weeks to discuss the projects you are working on, to discuss the class readings, and to discuss your own research ideas stimulated by getting involved in various projects.

OIDD 236 (TA)
Spring 2021 (Undergrad)

This course helps students learn to make strategic scaling decisions that are grounded in operational reality. Students will study how to build and evaluate the "operation systems" of the firm to maximize value with the focus on scaling the firm's operations. This involves tailoring the firm's operational competencies, assets, and processes to a specific business strategy. The course will approach the challenge of scaling operations and operations strategy by taking a holistic view that incorporates competitive strategy, financial evaluation, and the customer experience.

OIDD 636 (TA)
Spring 2021 (MBA)

The course is designed for students who plan to join rapidly growing ventures, who are preparing to scale their own ventures, or who plan to evaluate such ventures through the lens of investors or consultants. The goal of this course is to make strategic scaling decisions that are grounded in operational reality. The course adopts the perspective of the CEO and functional leaders in growing ventures and organizations and explores issues that leaders and managers encounter after a firm achieves product-market fit. We will approach the challenge of scaling by taking a holistic view that incorporates competitive strategy, financial evaluation, and the customer experience. We focus on decisions and challenges that many firms that try to scale their operations face with the focus on assessing the readiness of the firm to scale, and the required steps to scale. In particular, we will discuss whether the firm needs to reformulate its strategy; whether the firm should build competencies inhouse (for example, by investing in a portfolio of assets) or buy them (for example by developing and implementing a network strategy working with external suppliers) and the risks associated with scaling these. We will also discuss the organizational implications of scaling, focusing on designing the organizational structure and culture for growth, all while managing the challenges within and across the product, engineering, sales, marketing and sales functions.

OIDD 611 (TA)
Fall 2019 (EMBA), Spring 2020 (MBA), Fall 2020 (MBA), Spring 2021 (EMBA)

Matching supply with demand is an enormous challenge for firms: excess supply is too costly, inadequate supply irritates customers. In the course, we will explore how firms can better organize their operations so that they more effectively align their supply with the demand for their products and services. Throughout the course, we illustrate mathematical analysis applied to real operational challenges--we seek rigor and relevance. Our aim is to provide both tactical knowledge and high-level insights needed by general managers and management consultants. We will demonstrate that companies can use (and have used) the principles from this course to significantly enhance their competitiveness.

MGMT 610 (Facilitator)
Fall 2018, Fall 2019, Fall 2020 (MBA)

MGMT 610 is the first core course in the MBA Program and it cannot be waived. The first week of the fall term (in August) is dedicated to this formative and foundational experience. This course focuses on developing students' knowledge and skill set for teamwork and leadership. It is meant to be an intense immersion experience that draws strongly on the pedagogy of the Wharton Teamwork and Leadership Simulation, a team-based, highly interactive simulation that was custom-designed specifically to allow students to experience the core concepts they learn in this class. The three goals of this course are for students to learn: 1. Leadership behaviors: how to enact the skills that contribute to a team's effective performance. 2. Team dynamics: how to be an effective team member, as well as how to best design work teams; 3. Organizational awareness: understanding organizational culture. Format: A custom-designed Wharton-only simulation is paired with course sessions to deliver a unique learning experience. Classes will include experiental learning combined with debriefings, lectures, readings, class discussion and personal and group performance feedback. This course reflects the realities that informal leadership occurs in teams on an ongoing basis, that being a good team player is a part of leadership, and that many of one's early experiences with leadership will occur while working on teams.

OIDD 615 (TA)
Spring 2019 (EMBA)

Operations strategy is about organizing people and resources to gain a competitive advantage in the delivery of products (both goods and services) to customers. This course approaches this challenge primarily from two perspectives: 1) how should a firm design their products so that they can be profitably offered; 2) how can a firm best organize and acquire resources to deliver its portfolio of products to customers. To be able to make intelligent decisions regarding these high-level choices, this course also provides a foundation of analytical methods. These methods give students a conceptual framework for understanding the linkage between how a firm manages its supply and how well that supply matches the firm's resulting demand. Specific course topics include designing service systems, managing inventory and product variety, capacity planning, approaches to sourcing and supplier management, constructing global supply chains, managing sustainability initiatives, and revenue management. This course emphasizes both quantitative tools and qualitative frameworks. Neither is more important than the other.

OIDD 101 (TA)
Fall 2018 (Undergrad)

OIDD 101 explores a variety of common quantitative modeling problems that arise frequently in business settings, and discusses how they can be formally modeled and solved with a combination of business insight and computer-based tools. The key topics covered include capacity management, service operations, inventory control, structured decision making, constrained optimization and simulation. This course teaches how to model complex business situations and how to master tools to improve business performance. The goal is to provide a set of foundational skills useful for future coursework atWharton as well as providing an overview of problems and techniques that characterize disciplines that comprise Operations and Information Management.


1.200 (TA)
Fall 2014, Fall 2015 (SM-PhD)
Overall rating: 6.3/7 (2014), 6.4/7 (2015)

Problem-motivated introduction to methods, models and tools for the analysis and design of transportation networks including their planning, operations and control. Topics include: capacity of critical elements of transportation networks; traffic flows and deterministic and probabilistic delay models; formulation of optimization models for planning and scheduling of freight, transit and airline systems, and their solution using software packages; user- and system-optimal traffic assignment; control of traffic flows on highways, urban grids, and airspace; stochastic simulation modeling of traffic flows.

Recitation notes:
capacity/flow | LP: 1, 2 | IP | queueing: 1, 2, 3 | networks: 1, 2, 3 | simulation | review

15.730 (TA)
Spring 2015 (EMBA)
Overall rating: 4.35/5

Introduces students to the basic tools in using data to make informed management decisions. Covers basic topics in data analytics, including introductory probability, decision analysis, basic statistics, regression, simulation, linear and discrete optimization, and introductory machine learning. Spreadsheet exercises, cases, and examples drawn from marketing, finance, operations management, and other management functions. Restricted to first-year Sloan master's students.

Recitation notes:
decision analysis/binomial | LP/Solver | nonlinear optimization | review


CSCI 40 (TA/Project Mentor)
Spring 2012

This course provides an introduction to using computers to solve STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) data analysis, visualization, simulation, and numerical analysis problems. The course begins with an introduction to the basics of programming, accompanied by several applications of fundamental coding elements and concepts. As we do this we will explore some of the breadth of Computer Science as a discipline. This first part of the course will be taught in Python. Following this, we will explore more specialized topics related to scientific computing and mathematics that will allow students to access and analyze a number of "real world" problems. The later portion of the course will be taught in MATLAB.

ENGN 900 (TA/Discussion Leader)
Spring 2012

Ways of making effective decisions in managerial situations, especially situations with a significant technological component; decision analysis; time value of money; competitive situations; forecasting; planning and scheduling; manufacturing strategy; corporate culture. Lectures and discussions.

Haas School of Business, University of California Berkeley, CA

7/2021 - Present

Assistant Professor of Operations and IT Management

The Center for Applied Artificial Intelligence, University of Chicago Virtual


Summer Institute in Machine Learning and Economics

The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA

8/2016 - 5/2021

PhD in Operations, Information, and Decisions
AM in Statistics
Certificate in Social, Cognitive, and Affective Neuroscience
Wharton Social Impact Initiative Fellow
Penn Institute for Urban Research Affiliated PhD Scholar

Stephen M Ross School of Business, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI


Behavioral Operations Management Summer Institute

TEDxPenn Phildelphia, PA

9/2016 - 4/2019

Director of Marketing/Senior Advisor

Deloitte Consulting Boston, MA

2/2016 - 9/2016

Data Scientist, Strategy & Operations
Selected clients: retail/healthcare (medication adherence study), foodservice distributor (supply chain optimization), non-profit healthcare (people analytics), beverage corporation (automation)

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA

9/2013 - 2/2016

SM in Computational Science and Engineering
Kaufman Teaching Certificate Program

Goldman Sachs New York, NY

6/2014 - 8/2014

Summer Analyst, Securities Strats

Oracle Redwood Shores, CA

6/2012 - 9/2013

Software Engineer, Fusion Financials Technology

Brown University Providence, RI

9/2008 - 6/2012

ScB in Computer Engineering and Applied Mathematics-Economics
Tau Beta Pi, Omicron Delta Epsilon, Sigma Xi
Karen T Romers Undergraduate Teaching and Research Award

Symantec Los Angeles, CA

6/2010 - 8/2010

Summer Research Intern, UCLA IPAM-RIPS

Haas School of Business, University of California Berkeley, CA

6/2009 - 8/2009

Certificate in Business for Arts, Sciences, and Engineering